Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Fractions Gain Traction With Real- Life Models

Aug. 27, 2013 — If 3 is greater than 2, then ⅓
must be bigger than ½ -- right? Wrong. As
thousands of students head back to school
next week, many will use exactly that kind of
thinking when faced with fractions for the first
time. New research from Concordia University
shows that for children to understand math,
teachers must constantly make the connection
between abstract numbers and real world
examples.

Helena Osana, associate professor in
Concordia's Department of Education, and PhD
candidate Nicole Pitsolantis put this theory to
the test in a classroom of fifth and sixth
graders. Their findings -- published in the
professional journal Teaching Children
Mathematics, as well as in the British Journal
of Educational Psychology -- show students
understand math much more clearly when
teachers use pictures and concrete models to
demonstrate what fractions actually mean.
Those connections are even stronger when the
model is personally meaningful to the
students. Write out '¾' on the blackboard and
the concept is not so clear. Show kids ¾ of a
shoelace or talk about running ⅓of the way to
school and suddenly they get it.
Although teachers already use models when
talking about fractions -- for instance, to show
a picture of a pie with slices eaten -- they
often put them away too quickly. To prove that
the constant use of models made a bigger
impact, Osana and Pitsolantis tried teaching
with models for only part of the lesson and
then the entire lesson.
They found that students showed much greater
understanding when the models were
continually present. "Our study shows teachers
should not only include pictures and models
while teaching fractions, but also have them
side by side throughout the class while
continually making clear connections between
the concepts and the models," says Osana.

The lessons produced by this research have the
potential to go beyond the classroom. "This is
something not only useful for teachers but
also for parents," says Osana. "Because
children are studying fractions, parents think
they're not able to help. But parents can have
positive effect on learning too. Something as
simple as writing '¾' out on a piece of paper,
then demonstrating what it means to use ¾ of
a cup of sugar, or filling up the gas tank until
it reaches the ⅔ mark, then writing and
pointing to the numbers '⅔ ,' can really go a
long way towards demystifying math," she
says.
Pitsolantis, who also teaches fourth and fifth
grade math at Lower Canada College in
Montreal, says that the depth of
misunderstanding that happens when models
are abandoned surprised her. She and Osana
are now testing out how teachers can
successfully incorporate concrete models into
other grades.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided
by Concordia University .

And ( sciencedaily magazine ).

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Formulae----1

Maths photo

Spatial Training Boosts Math Skills

June 25, 2013 — Training young children in
spatial reasoning can improve their math
performance, according to a groundbreaking
study from Michigan State University
education scholars.

The researchers trained 6- to 8-year-olds in
mental rotation, a spatial ability, and found
their scores on addition and subtraction
problems improved significantly. The mental
rotation training involved imagining how two
halves of an object would come together to
make a whole, when the halves have been
turned at an angle.

Past research has found a link between spatial
reasoning and math, but the MSU study is the
first to provide direct evidence of a causal
connection -- that when children are trained in
one ability, improvement is seen in the other.

The findings will be published in a forthcoming
issue of the Journal of Cognition and
Development.
Kelly Mix, professor of educational psychology,
said the findings suggest spatial training
"primes" the brain to better tackle calculation
problems. Mix authored the study with Yi-Ling
Cheng, a doctoral student in MSU's College of
Education.

"What's shocking is that we saw these
improvements in math performance after
giving the students just one 20-minute training
session in spatial ability," Mix said. "Imagine if
the training had been six weeks."
Understanding the connection between spatial
ability and math, she said, is especially
important in the early elementary grades
because many studies indicate early
intervention is critical for closing achievement
gaps in math.

Spatial ability is important for success in many
fields, from architecture to engineering to
meteorology, according to a Johns Hopkins
University paper. An astronomer must visualize
the structure of the solar system and the
motions of the objects in it, for example, while
a radiologist must be able to interpret the
image on an X-ray.
Some education experts have called for
including spatial reasoning in the elementary
math curriculum. But there are many forms of
spatial ability and Mix said it's important to
first figure out how each of them may or may
not relate to the various math disciplines.

To that end, Mix is leading a larger study that
tests elementary students on different forms of
spatial ability and math performance.
Mix's research into spatial ability and math is
funded by two grants totaling $2.8 million
from the Institute of Education Sciences, the
research arm of the U.S. Department of
Education.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided
by Michigan State University .
Note: Materials may be edited for content and
length. For further information, please contact
the source cited above.

Journal Reference:

1. Yi Ling Cheng, Kelly S. Mix. Spatial Training
Improves Children's Mathematics Ability .
Journal of Cognition and Development , 2012; :
120919075341007 DOI:
10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Stabilizing Aircraft During Takeoff and Landing Using Math

Aug. 20, 2013 — One of the lesser known
concerns about commercial aircraft is their
stability on the ground during taxiing, takeoff,
and landing. During these processes, planes
must maintain stability under various operating
conditions. However, in some situations, the
aircraft landing gear displays unwanted
oscillations, which are referred to as shimmy
oscillations.

In a paper published last month in the SIAM
Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, authors
Chris Howcroft, Bernd Krauskopf, Mark
Lowenberg, and Simon Neild study the
dynamics of aircraft landing gear using
nonlinear models. The dynamics of landing
gear shimmy and the wheel-ground interaction
are fundamentally nonlinear.

"Shimmy oscillations of aircraft landing gear
have long been a problem, and their
prediction and prevention remains an ongoing
challenge in landing gear design," explains
author Chris Howcroft. "The issue is that a
landing gear may display the desired behavior
during ground take-off/landing manoeuvres
over several hundred or so flights, but then
suddenly oscillate given just the right -- or
rather, the wrong -- conditions."

Fortunately, mathematical models provide
cost-effective ways to study the dynamics of
the main landing gear (MLG) and determine the
types of oscillations that may occur under
different conditions. "The work we conducted
clarifies under which conditions shimmy
oscillations can be encountered in the MLG of
a representative midsize passenger aircraft. We
identified different types of shimmy
oscillations and showed where they occur,"
says Howcroft.

"Having the right mathematical model is really
the key," he adds. "Actual testing is extremely
expensive; however, nonlinear analysis
methods are very well suited to identifying
these hard-to-find dynamics. They may also be
employed to determine the shimmy
characteristics before the aircraft has actually
been built."

The model can provide insights not only into
aircraft operation, but also design features,
and can aid in adjusting both for optimum
stability.
Aircraft landing gear supports the weight of
the aircraft during landing and ground
operations. In addition to their wheels, landing
gear also have shock absorbing equipment or
"shock struts" as well as brakes, retraction
mechanisms, controls, and structural entities
that attach the gear to the aircraft.
The model in the paper takes into account tire-
contact dynamics and the orientation of the
side-stay, the part of the aircraft that supports
the shock strut. It characterizes the motion of
the system in terms of dynamics of the MLG,
which are expressed as three degrees of
freedom: rotation about the main strut, and
in-plane and out-of-plane motion with respect
to the plane of main strut and side-stay. After
determining the dynamics for the simplest
geometric case, where the side-stay is
perpendicular to the direction of travel, the
authors use the model to study different side-
stay orientations.

"For the specific case of MLG, we developed a
nonlinear and fully parameterised model that
allowed us to map out how its dynamics
depends on operational parameters, such as
aircraft velocity and loading, and design
parameters describing the geometry of the
landing gear," explains Howcroft. "In contrast
to the more traditional approach of performing
large numbers of simulations, this was
achieved by employing advanced tools from
dynamical systems that track solutions and
stability changes in parameters directly."

Moreover, other parameters could be
incorporated into the model further down the
road, such as runway conditions or tire
pressure, or physical effects such as the
dynamics of the shock absorber.

"Future directions of this research will focus
on the incorporation and assessment of
additional nonlinear effects," says Howcroft.
"For example, mechanical joints loosen over
the lifespan of an aircraft landing gear, and
this may have a dramatic effect on dynamic
performance, service life and maintenance
requirements of the landing gear."

"Nonlinear modeling and analysis are now
being introduced as tools into industrial
practice, via the recent development of a
MATLAB toolbox," says author Simon Neild.

"This is exciting to see, and has allowed our
group to tackle not only the problem of
landing gear shimmy, but of aircraft ground
manoeuvres and airliner loss-of-control in
flight."
Author Bernd Krauskopf adds.

"This project is
part of a larger research effort in collaboration
with Airbus into aircraft ground dynamics via
the bifurcation analysis of nonlinear models.
Related work concerns shimmy in nose landing
gears and its interplay with the dynamics of
the fuselage."
Future work would integrate many different
aspects into a unifying model.

"Ultimately our
current research is moving towards the
integration of landing gear and airframe into
an overall model that allows us to create a full
dynamic picture of aircraft ground dynamics,"
says author Mark Lowenbergm.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided
by Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics. And  ( sciencedaily magazine  )

Note: Materials may be edited for content and
length. For further information, please contact
the source cited above.

Journal Reference:

1. Chris Howcroft, Bernd Krauskopf, Mark H.
Lowenberg, Simon A. Neild. Influence of
Variable Side-Stay Geometry on the Shimmy
Dynamics of an Aircraft Dual-Wheel Main
Landing Gear . SIAM Journal on Applied
Dynamical Systems , 2013; 12 (3): 1181 DOI:
10.1137/120887643

Monday, August 19, 2013

"Math in Daily Life"

When you buy a car, follow a recipe, or
decorate your home, you're using math
principles. People have been using these same
principles for thousands of years, across
countries and continents. Whether you're
sailing a boat off the coast of Japan or building
a house in Peru, you're using math to get
things done.

How can math be so universal?

First,
human beings didn't invent math
concepts; we discovered them. Also, the
language of math is numbers, not English
or German or Russian. If we are well versed in
this language of numbers, it can help us make
important decisions and perform everyday
tasks. Math can help us to shop wisely, buy the
right insurance, remodel a home within a
budget, understand population growth, or even
bet on the horse with the best chance of
winning the race.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Preschoolers Inability to Estimate Quantity Relates to Later Math Difficulty

Aug. 14, 2013 — Preschool children  who
showed less ability to estimate the number of
objects in a group were 2.4 times more likely
to have a later mathematical learning disability
than other young people, according to a team
of University of Missouri psychologists.

Parents may be able to help their children
develop their skills at approximating group
sizes by emphasizing numerals while interacting
with young children.

"Lacking skill at estimating group size may
impede a child's ability to learn the concept of
how numerals symbolize quantities and how
those quantities relate to each other," said
study co-author David Geary, professor of
psychological sciences at MU. "Not
understanding the values numbers symbolize
then leads to difficulties in math and problems
in school, which our previous studies suggest
may be related to later difficulties with
employment."

Geary said that parents may be able to improve
a child's innate skill at approximating group
size and suggested that caregivers draw
children's attention to quantities in everyday
situations. For example, after a preschool-aged
child completes a series of tasks, a parent can
ask the youth how many tasks they completed.

"Talking to children about how the world can
be represented in numbers may help young
people develop the ability to estimate the size
of a group, which may prepare them for later
mathematics education" said co-author Kristy
vanMarle, assistant professor of psychological
science at MU. "Asking them 'how many'
whenever they encounter a group of objects or
images can help them understand that the
world can be understood in terms of
numbers."

However, the inability to approximate group
size was not the only factor related to later
math problems. The MU team also found that
preschoolers who lagged behind others in their
understanding of the symbolic value of
numerals and other related concepts were 3.6
to 4.5 times more likely to show mathematical
learning difficulties, which corroborates earlier
research by Geary, and extends it to a much
younger age.

Doctoral student Felicia W. Chu was the lead
author of the study, "Quantitative deficits of
preschool children at risk for mathematical
learning disability," which was published in the
journal Frontiers in Psychology.
"One major reason I came to the University of
Missouri was the psychology department's
strong reputation for studying children's
mathematical education," said Chu.
Geary is Curators' Professor and a Thomas
Jefferson Fellow in the Department of
Psychological Sciences in MU's College of Arts
and Science. vanMarle is the director of MU's
Developmental Cognition Lab.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided
by University of Missouri-Columbia .
And ( science daily magazine

Note: Materials may be edited for content and
length. For further information, please contact
the source cited above.

Journal Reference:

1. Felicia W. Chu, Kristy vanMarle, David C.
Geary. Quantitative Deficits of Preschool
Children at Risk for Mathematical Learning
Disability . Frontiers in Psychology, 2013; 4
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00195